Publications
Tarazona, Y., Hightower, M., Xu, P., Zhang, Y. (2024). Treatment of produced water from the Permian Basin: Chemical and toxicological characterization of the effluent from a pilot-scale low-temperature distillation system. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 67, 106146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.106146
“This study evaluated the performance of a novel pilot-scale low-temperature thermal distillation system treating hypersline produced water from the Permian Basin. The system showed a robust performance during the operation and effectively reduced salinity (>99%), major ions (95–99%), heavy metals (60–100%), ammonia (93%), and organics (43–60%) in feed PW. However, the distillate still had residual volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds, metals, and ammonia, which caused the toxicity. This study provides insight into additional polishing steps that may be coupled with distillation to achieve non-toxic effluents suitable for discharge.”
Tarazona, Y., Wang, H. B., Hightower, M., Xu, P., Zhang, Y. (2024). Benchmarking produced water treatment strategies for non-toxic effluents: integrating thermal distillation with granular activated carbon and zeolite post-treatment. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 478, 135549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135549
“This study evaluated a treatment train that included a low-temperature thermal distillation pilot system followed by granular activated carbon (GAC) and zeolite post-treatment for processing hypersaline Permian Basin PW. The distillate integrated with GAC and zeolite can reduce the concentration of potential stressors in the final effluent to below detection limits. This resulted in a consistent toxicity reduction across all whole effluent toxicity tests. This study realizes the feasibility of treating PW to non-toxic levels and meeting reuse and discharge requirements.”
Chen, L., Xu, P., Zhang, Y., Betts, D., Ghurye, G.L., Wang, H. (2024). Au-TiO2 nanoparticles enabled catalytic treatment of oil and gas produced water in slurry and vacuum membrane distillation systems, Journal of Water Process Engineering 65, 105745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.105745
“This study developed innovative membrane distillation with nanoparticles to enable effective treatment of produced water (PW) from the Permian Basin with salinity of ∼118 g/L. Au-TiO2 coating on ceramic membranes improved the distillate flux and rejected >99.9% of salts and >96% of dissolved organic carbon. Targeted analysis of three groups of petroleum hydrocarbons and 70 volatile organic compounds showed that only 2-butanone and acetone were detected in the distillates with removal efficiencies of 70-80%.”
Delanka-Pedige, H.M.K., Young, R.B., Abutokaikah, M.T., Chen, L., Wang, H., Imihamillage, K.A.B.I., Thimons, S., Jahne, M.A., Williams, A.J., Zhang, Y., and Xu, P. (2024). Non-targeted Analysis and Toxicity Prediction for Evaluation of Photocatalytic Membrane Distillation Removing Organic Contaminants from Hypersaline Oil and Gas Field-Produced Water. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 471, 134436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.134436
“This study evaluated a novel photocatalytic membrane distillation (PMD) process, with and without a UV light source, against a standard vacuum membrane distillation (VMD) process for treating the Permian Basin produced water, utilizing targeted analyses and a non-targeted chemical identification workflow coupled with toxicity predictions. Non-targeted analysis together with toxicity prediction provides a competent supportive tool to assess treatment efficiency and potential impacts on public health and the environment during PW reuse.”
Edirisooriya, E.M.N.T., Wang, H., Banerjee, S., Longley, K., Wright, W., Mizuno, W., Xu, P. (2024). Economic feasibility of developing alternative water supplies for agricultural irrigation. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering 43, 100987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2023.100987
“This study evaluates the economic feasibility of developing nontraditional water for agriculture and identifies strategies to address the challenges by increasing affordability. In the Southwest United States, such as California, reuse of filtered disinfected municipal wastewater offers the most cost-effective option followed by desalinated brackish water, treated produced water, and seawater. High costs, energy demand, concentrate disposal, and soil salinity management are the primary challenges in using alternative water for irrigation.”
Ali, A.B., Armijo, M. and Shukla, M. 2024. Irrigation of Atriplex species with highly saline produced water for rangelands improvement in southeastern New Mexico. Rangelands. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rala.2024.04.001
“This study evaluates the effects of diluted produced water from the Permian Basin (34-70 dS/m or 23,800 – 49,000 ppm) on A. lentiformis and A. canescens performance and growth in greenhouse experiments. Both species are good candidates for reusing alternate water sources, such as saline produced water (without heavy metal or radon), especially in the degraded rangelands in southeastern New Mexico, where produced water is also generated.”
Eyitayo, S.I., Watson, M.C., Kolawole, O., Xu, P., Bruant, R., Henthorne, L. (2024). External utilization of oil and gas produced water: Why is the industry hesitant to full-scale implementation? Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02746-0
“Based on life cycle assessment and life cycle cost methods, the challenges related to beneficial reuse are highlighted, and the reason for the hesitancy of the petroleum industry to venture into external solutions is presented. This work proposes progressive recommendations that provide insight into achieving long-term environmental sustainability by exploring external uses of PW and harnessing its merit.”
Delanka-Pedige, H.M.K., Zhang, Y., Young, R.B., Wang, H., Hu, L., Danforth, C. and Xu, P. 2023. Safe reuse of treated produced water outside oil and gas fields? A review of current practices, challenges, opportunities, and a risk-based pathway for produced water treatment and fit-for-purpose reuse. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering 42, 100973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2023.100973
“Adopting treated produced water (PW) for reuse outside the O&G sector needs to address the challenges of complex water chemistry, limited toxicity data, and knowledge gaps for appropriate regulatory responses, including risk assessment frameworks on human health and the environment, socio-technical–economic assessments of treatment and reuse applications, and long-term demonstrations and monitoring of fit-for-purpose reuse. This opinion paper proposes a holistic, state-of-the-science pathway for PW treatment, management, and fit-for-purpose reuse outside O&G fields.”
“The novel photocatalytic membrane distillation (PMD) concept provides a promising technology for hypersaline PW treatment, and TiO2 coating significantly reduced membrane fouling and scaling, improved distillate quality, and maintained stable permeate flux. The photocatalyst activation by ultraviolet-light emitting diodes (UV-LED) light further increased the permeate flux and enhanced the total organic carbon removal from 82.0% (without UV-LED) to 89.7% (with UV-LED). UV-LED irradiation did not affect ammonia and metals removal in PMD, reaching 99.4% and > 99.99% removal, respectively.”
Eyitayo, S.I., Watson, M.C., Kolawole, O., Xu, P., Lawal, K.A., Wigwee, M.E., Alberto, G. (2023). Novel systematic approach for produced water volume quantification applicable for beneficial reuse. Environmental Science: Advances. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2023/VA/D2VA00282E
“This study employs decline-curve analysis (DCA), type-curves method, and historical drilling and production data to develop a new systematic method for quantifying and predicting PW volumes at the basin and other aggregate levels. The applicability and robustness of the proposed method are demonstrated using Permian Basin as a case study.”
Eyitayo, S.I., Watson, M.C., Kolawole, O., Xu, P., Bruant, R., Henthorne, L. (2023) Produced Water Treatment: Review of Technological Advancement in Hydrocarbon Recovery Processes, Well Stimulation, and Permanent Disposal Wells. SPE Production & Operations, 38(01), 51-62. https://doi.org/10.2118/212275-PA
“This study presents a detailed account of the historical development of current produced water treatment practices, disposal, available technology, and challenges in implementation. Forward-looking recommendations are given on how emerging technologies can be integrated into everyday oil and gas activities to achieve the purpose-specific treatment goal.”
Ben Ali, A.R., Shukla, M.K., Marsalis, M. and Khan, N. 2022. Irrigation with desalinated and raw produced waters: Effects on soil properties, and germination and growth of five forages. Agricultural Water Management 274, 107966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107966
“The study examined the effects of irrigation with produced waters from the San Juan Basin on five perennials cool season forage, species western wheatgrass, alfalfa, meadow bromegrass, Russian wildrye, and tall fescue. The forages were grown in a greenhouse, in loamy soil, and irrigated with desalinated reverse osmosis RO (231 mg/l), diluted RAW (1400 mg/l), RAW produced (8610 mg/l), and tap (427 mg/l) water. Utilizing desalinated and diluted produced waters as a valuable source of water for irrigation after treatment could alleviate water demand in arid oil producing regions.”
Jiang, W., Lin, L., Xu, X., Wang, H., Xu, P. (2022) Analysis of regulatory framework for produced water management and reuse in major oil and gas producing regions in the United States. Water 14 (14), 2162. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/14/14/2162
“This study reviews the current regulatory framework for produced water production, management, and reuse in the major oil and gas production areas in the U.S., including Appalachian Basin, California, Colorado, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas, and Wyoming.”
Sabie, R.P., Pillsbury, L., and Xu, P. (2022). Spatiotemporal Analysis of Produced Water Demand for Fit-For-Purpose Reuse—A Permian Basin, New Mexico Case Study. Water 14 (11), 1735. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/14/11/1735
“In this study, a generalized framework was developed for estimating produced water (PW) supply and potential demand for treated PW reuse in agriculture, dust suppression, power generation, and river flow augmentation using Eddy and Lea counties, New Mexico as a case study”
Tidwell, V., Gunda, T., Caballero, M., Xu, P., Xu, X., Bernknopf, R., Broadbent, C., Malczynski, L.A., Jacobson, J. (2022) Produced Water-Economic, Socio, Environmental Simulation Model (PW-ESEim) Model: Proof-of-Concept for Southeastern New Mexico. SAND2022-6636R. Published by Sandia National Lab.(SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States). https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1868149
“A proof-of-concept tool, the Produced Water-Economic, Socio, Environmental Simulation model (PW-ESESim), was developed to support ease of analysis. The tool was designed to facilitate head-to-head comparison of alternative produced water sources, treatment, and reuse water management strategies. A graphical user interface (GUI) guides the user through the selection and design of alternative produced water treatment and reuse strategies and the associated health and safety risk and economic benefits.”
Jiang, W., Xu, X., Hall, R., Zhang, Y., Carroll, K.C., Ramos, F., Engle, M.A., Lin, L., Wang, H., Sayer, M., Xu, P. (2022). Characterization of Produced Water and Surrounding Surface Water in the Permian Basin, the United States. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 430, 128409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128409
“In this research, over 300 analytes for organics, inorganics, and radionuclides were quantitatively analyzed in produced water (PW) samples from the Permian Basin and in surface water samples from the Pecos River in New Mexico. This study provides baseline analytical information to advance PW research for potential reuse and fills the knowledge gap regarding PW quality to support science-based decision making.
Jiang, W., Xu, X., Hall, R., Zhang, Y., Carroll, K.C., Ramos, F., Engle, M.A., Lin, L., Wang, H., Sayer, M., Xu, P. (2022). Datasets associated with the characterization of produced water and Pecos River water in the Permian Basin, the United States. Data in Brief, 43, 108443. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340922006400
“This paper presents data related to the analysis of produced water and river water samples in the Permian Basin with a specific focus on wet chemistry, mineral salts, metals, oil and grease, volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds, radionuclides, ammonia, hydraulic fracturing additives, and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances.”
Hu, L., Jiang, W., Xu, X., Wang, H., Carroll, K.C., Xu, P., Zhang, Y. (2022). Toxicological characterization of produced water from the Permian Basin. Science of The Total Environment. 815(1), 152943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.152943
“In this study, an in vitro toxicity assessment was conducted using aquatic microorganisms to explore toxicological characteristics of produced water (PW) from the Permian Basin, New Mexico. It was found that high salinity, organic contaminants, metals, and ammonia present in PW are major toxicity drivers and need to be removed for fit-for-purpose beneficial uses of treated PW ”
Thakur, P., Ward, A.L., Schaub, T.M. (2022). Occurrence and behavior of uranium and thorium series radionuclides in the Permian shale hydraulic fracturing wastes. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29 (28), 43058-43071. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-021-18022-z
“This study explored the risk of releasing radioactive materials during the oil and gas recovery process in the Permian Basin, New Mexico. The results confirmed the presence of radioactive materials (224Ra, 226Ra, 228Ra) in addition to dissolved salts, divalent cations, and high total dissolved solids in the hydraulic fracturing wastes.”
Chen, L., Wang, H., Xu, P. (2022). Photocatalytic membrane reactors for produced water treatment and reuse: fundamentals, affecting factors, rational design, and evaluation metrics. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 127493.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304389421024614
“In this study, the potential of photocatalytic membrane reactors (PMR) to treat produced water (PW) was evaluated. The mechanisms of photocatalysis and membrane processes in a PMR, factors affecting PMR performance, rational design, and evaluation metrics for PW treatment were critically reviewed.”
Jiang, W., Pokharel, B., Lin, L., Cao, H., Carroll, K.C., Zhang, Y., Galdeano, C., Musale, D.A., Ghurye, G.L., Xu, P. (2021). Analysis and Prediction of Produced Water Quantity and Quality in the Permian Basin using Machine Learning Techniques. Science of the Total Environment. 141693.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048969721047689
“In this research, historical produced water (PW) quantity and quality data in the New Mexico portion (NM) of the Permian Basin were comprehensively analyzed, and then, various machine learning algorithms were applied to predict PW quantity for different types of oil and gas wells.”
Jiang, W., Lin, L., Xu. X., Cheng, X., Zhang, Y., Hall, R., Xu, P. (2021). A Critical Review of Analytical Methods for Comprehensive Characterization of Produced Water. Water, 2021, 13(2), 183; https://doi.org/10.3390/w13020183
“This paper broadly discusses current analytical techniques for produced water characterization, including both standard and research methods. Multi-tiered analytical procedures are proposed including field sampling; sample preservation; pretreatment techniques; basic water quality measurements; organic, inorganic, and radioactive materials analysis; and biological characterization.”
Chen, L., Xu, P., Kota, K., Kuravi, S., Wang, H. (2021). Solar distillation of highly saline produced water using low-cost and high-performance carbon black and airlaid paper-based evaporator (CAPER). Chemosphere, 269, 129372.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129372
“This research introduces a solar-driven carbon black and airlaid paper-based evaporator (CAPER) for desalination of produced water in the Permian Basin, New Mexico. CAPER is low cost, robust, and has the capability of achieving higher removals of salts, heavy metals, Ca, Na, Mg, Mn, Ni, Se, Sr, and V.”
Hu, L., Wang, H., Xu, P. and Zhang, Y. (2021) Biomineralization of hypersaline produced water using microbially induced calcite precipitation. Water Research, 190, 116753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.116753
“This study demonstrates the ability of the microbially induced calcite precipitation (MICP) technique that utilizes ureolytic bacteria, to remove Ca2+ and toxic contaminants from high salinity produce water for the first time.”
Chen, L., Xu, P., Wang, H. (2020) Interplay of the Factors Affecting Water Flux and Salt Rejection in Membrane Distillation: A State-of-the-Art Critical Review. Water 2020, 12(10), 2841; https://doi.org/10.3390/w12102841
“This review paper deeply examines the effects of membrane characteristics, feed solution composition, and operating conditions on water flux, mass transport, heat transfer and salt rejection in membrane distillation process.”
Lu Lin, Wenbing Jiang, Lin Chen, Pei Xu and Huiyao Wang (2020). Treatment of Produced Water with Photocatalysis: Recent Advances, Affecting Factors and Future Research Prospects. Catalysts, 10(8), 924. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10080924
“This review paper investigated the applicability of photocatalysis-based treatment for produced water (PW) treatment. Factors affecting decontamination, strategies to improve photocatalysis efficiency, recent developments, and future research prospects on photocatalysis-derived systems for PW treatment are discussed here in detail.”
Alfredo Zendejas Rodriguez, Huiyao Wang, Lei Hu, Yanyan Zhang, and Pei Xu. (2020). Treatment of Produced Water in the Permian Basin for Hydraulic Fracturing: Comparison of Different Coagulation Processes and Innovative Filter Media. Water, 12(3), 770. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12030770
“In this research, chemical coagulation [using FeCl3 and Al2(SO4)3] was compared with electrocoagulation (using aluminum electrodes) for their suitability in removing suspended contaminants from produced water for reuse in hydraulic fracturing. The feasibility of several filter media was also studied for refining effluent of the coagulation”
Scanlon, B.R., Reedy, R.C., Xu, P., Engle, M., Nicot, J.P., Yang, Q., and Ikonnikova, S. (2020). Datasets associated with investigating the potential for beneficial reuse of produced water from oil and gas extraction outside of the energy sector. Data in Brief, 105406. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340920303000
“This article presents data related to volumes of water co-produced with oil and gas production, county-level estimates of annual water use volumes by various sectors, including hydraulic fracturing water use, and the quality of produced water.”
Scanlon, B.R., Reedy, R.C., Xu, P., Engle, M., Nicot, J.P., Yang, Q., and Ikonnikova, S. (2020). Can we Beneficially Reuse Produced Water from Oil and Gas Extraction in the U.S.? Science of the Total Environment, 717, 137085. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969720305957
“This study investigated the quantity and the quality of produced water volumes in major U.S. shale oil and gas plays relative to treatment and potential reuse options in irrigation, municipal use, industrial use, surface water and groundwater recharge, and hydraulic fracturing.”
Hu, L., Yu, J., Luo, H., Wang, H., Xu, P., Zhang, Y. (2020). Simultaneous Recovery of Ammonium, Potassium and Magnesium from Produced Water by Struvite Precipitation. Chemical Engineering Journal, 382, 123001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.123001
“This study demonstrated the feasibility of recovering struvite fertilizer from produced water after calcium pretreatment. Recovered struvite was in sufficient quality with no accumulation of heavy metals and organic contaminants.”
Chaudhary, B., Sabie, R., Engle, M., Xu, P., Willman, S., Carroll, K. (2019) Produced Water Quality Spatial Variability and Alternative-Source Water Analysis Applied to the Permian Basin, USA. Hydrogeology Journal, 27, 2889-2905. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10040-019-02054-4
“In this research, geochemical variability of produced water from Guadalupian (Middle Permian) to Ordovician formations was statistically and geo-statistically evaluated in the western half of the Permian Basin using the US Geological Survey’s Produced Waters Geochemical Database and the New Mexico Water and Infrastructure Data System.”
Geza, M., Ma, G., Kim, H., Cath, T.Y., Xu, P. (2018). iDST: An integrated decision support tool for treatment and beneficial use of non-traditional water supplies – Part I. Methodology. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 25, 236-246. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2214714418303350
“In this study, a Visual Basic for Applications (VBA) - based integrated decision support tool was developed to select a combination of treatment technologies/trains for different types of alternative water sources (municipal wastewater, geothermal water) and beneficial reuse options (portable reuse, irrigation, surface discharge, and power plant cooling).”
Ma, G., Geza, M., Cath, T.Y., Drewes, J.E., Xu, P. (2018). iDST: An integrated decision support tool for treatment and beneficial use of non-traditional water supplies – Part II. Marcellus and Barnett shale case studies. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 25, 258-268. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2214714418303362
“This study presents an integrated decision support tool to assist in selecting treatment technologies and potential water reuse options for produced water considering the Marcellus Shale in Pennsylvania and the Barnett Shale in Texas as case studies.”